When it comes to dating, most of us have no idea what the hell we're doing. And in the process, he didn't just reinvent his dating life - he changed the romantic lives of thousands of guys across the country.
The truth is - it's not what you think and it's not what you expect. For more fun stuff, including additional research used in the show, go to P. Want to know when the show comes out before my parents? Special thanks to Joe for letting us use some of the best clips from the show.
Special guest Joe Antenucci sits down with the guys and cover:- The specific process Joe used to exponentially improve his dating life (with the help of a few guys)- How to recreate a derivative of that process for yourself (and be a normal human being)- An exclusive behind-the-scenes look at "Helping Joe" - How long should you wait to text back? Sign up for the Insider list, plus, get bonus content you can't get anywhere else. - Here's the guys behind Helping Joe: Tucker Max, Charlie Hoehn, and Nils Parker. Co-written by Tucker Max and Geoffrey Miller (professor at the University of New Mexico) and it's the only book on the subject that has more research references in the back than all of my college textbooks combined. In that example, Birger's talking about the "man deficit" - a phenomenon of less men than women nationally.- Kevin referenced Daring Greatly.
Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant and worth reading everything they have. - I used some data from Date-nomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game by Jon Birger - numbers were taken by the U. I read that years ago - but it's still incredible and if you ever wanted to read a book on emotional vulnerability, you just found it.- Curious about deliberate practice? Also, Malcolm Gladwell and Cal Newport talk like goddamn pro's on this subject, so check them out too.
Finding a date who shares your interests on standard dating sites can be difficult, but on Alternative Dates it isn’t.
Simply sign-up for free and you’ll instantly be able to connect with our extensive community of single alternative daters whether they are punks, goths, metal-heads, rockers or emos. Alternative Dates is the only online dating site where you are sure to fit in.
Although recent methodological advances have allowed the incorporation of rate variation in molecular dating analyses, the calibration procedure, performed mainly through fossils, remains resistant to improvements.
One source of uncertainty pertains to the assignment of fossils to specific nodes in a phylogeny, especially when alternative possibilities exist that can be equally justified on morphological grounds.
The use of DNA sequences to estimate the timing of evolutionary events is increasingly popular.
Just like Tinder, you swipe left for “no” and right for “yes” through a slideshow of singles, but on Bumble, women hold all the power – only they can start the conversation.
If you’re looking for matches of the same gender, the same rules don’t apply. After a match, women have 24 hours to respond – if they don’t, the match disappears. Bumble came with a keyboard of hilarious gifs that I could use in lieu of actual words.
Here we expand on a recently developed fossil cross-validation method to evaluate whether alternative nodal assignments of multiple fossils produce calibration sets that differ in their internal consistency.
We use an enlarged Crypteroniaceae-centered phylogeny of Myrtales, six fossils, and 72 combinations of calibration points, termed calibration sets, to identify (i) the fossil assignments that produce the most internally consistent calibration sets and (ii) the mean ages, derived from these calibration sets, for the split of the Southeast Asian Crypteroniaceae from their West Gondwanan sister clade (node X).